Owen and Hardy- poems

        In Channel Firing by T. Hardy and Miners by W. Owens both poets are posting that they see war in a negative light, but they are showing us from different perspectives. Thomas Hardy is more unique than Owen in his style of writing, he wrote about idealistic views, but he never actually went to war, he never had the first fleck in knowledge, his poetry was speculation and imaginativeness. Owens on the other top shows the lector what the conditions were really like during the First World fight and to sterilize it clear that the events that surrounded him, were not pleasant.         Hardy uses his imagination to ca-ca a discussion between paragon and skeletons in their coffins in Channel Firing . Although it is a humorous verse it is rattling critical in its scornful condemnation of mans unmanageable propensity for conflict. Hardy injects a recollection of what war was to those who fought and died in foregoing years under the thunder of other guns, and how a great deal worsened it might be this time because nations [are] striving toilsome to consume red war yet redder....(11.13-14). Hardy makes no commentary of the sound of the gun sacking, but he gives us a dimension of the sound by describing of the reaction of the nocturnal beasts and the inhumed dead.

It is cognize that the sound shook all [their] coffins as [they] prepare (1.2) and arose the yawl of wakened hounds (1.6).         Gods voice in this poem seems to be employ to convey messages that Hardy thinks are very in-chief(postnominal), things so important God would ac tually say them. For instance, Hardy condemn! s the leaden fire of the gunnery implement just offshore so God says For if it were theyd hold up to scrub up Hells floor for so much threatening that Hell awaits the warriors for... If you motivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay