"Art or Propaganda?" - a comparison between Alain Locke and W.E.B.Dubois

1. Introduction. W.E.B. Dubois and Alain Locke were important contri only ifors to the epoch called Harlem Renaissance. With their writings atrists unavoidablenessed to do something against racism, they precious to confront that the African - Americans dont contrive to feel inferior. Writing in the April, 1915, issue of Crisis, DuBois said: In art and literature we should show to loose the tremendous emotional wealth of the lightlessness and the striking strength of his problems through writing ... and other forms of art. We should resurrect swallow ancient Negro art and history, and we should set the black population before the world as both a plenteous artist and a strong subject for artistic treatment. DuBois declared what were to be recurrent themes of the decade of the twenties: the Negro as a producer and a subject of art, and the Negros artistic push through stave as indices of his contribution to American life. (Linnemann R.J. p 79) In essense, both Locke and DuBois hold about what constituted good art. It was the answer of art on which they did not agree. DuBois doubted if one could really have a disembarrass art or beauty; but Locke was not pursuit for the Negro penr a disembody beauty. (Linnemann, R.J. p 92) DuBois power plenteousy disagreed with Lockes view that Beauty rather than Propaganda should be the object of Negro literature and art. ...If Mr. Lockes thesis is insisted upon too overmuch is going to turn the Negro Renaissance into decadence. (Marable, M.. p 130) low gear I will contact some basical facts about the Harlem Renaissance. In the main part I will show the opinions of A. Locke, who preferred arts, and W.E.B. DuBois, who was for propaganda. In point ternary I will write about DuBoiss life. After that I will show what he wanted in general. The... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our! page: cheap essay